首页> 外文OA文献 >Efficacy and safety of nebulized L-epinephrine associated with dexametasone in post-intubation laryngitis
【2h】

Efficacy and safety of nebulized L-epinephrine associated with dexametasone in post-intubation laryngitis

机译:雾化的L-肾上腺素联合地塞米松治疗插管后喉炎的疗效和安全性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: to assess the efficacy and safety of the use of nebulized L-epinephrine associated with dexamethasone in post-intubation laryngitis. Method: we carried out a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study with two cohorts of patients with postintubation laryngitis graded 3 to 6 by Downes and Raphaely score and during two years. Our population was divided into two groups: A and B; both groups received intravenous dexamethasone and nebulized saline with (group B) and without (group A) L-epinephrine. The efficacy was assessed by Downes and Raphaely's score. The side effects of epinephrine were evaluated according to occurrence of arrhythmia, to increased blood pressure, and to average heart rate of group B in comparison to group A. Results: twenty-two patients were included in group A (average score = 4.8) and 19 in group B (average score = 5.2). During treatment, 3 patients in group A presented a score of 8 and were reintubated. This group also showed higher clinical scores than group B during the first two hours of the protocol; these results were not statistically significant. No side effects were observed due to epinephrine. The gasometric parameters were adequate in both groups, but better in the control group. Conclusions: we did not observe increased efficacy for the treatment of post-intubation laryngitis when nebulized L-epinephrine was used simultaneously with intravenous dexamethasone. Some indicators, however, did present a favorable trend when combined therapy was used and should be submitted to further evaluation.
机译:目的:评估雾化L-肾上腺素联合地塞米松在插管后喉炎中的疗效和安全性。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究,研究对象为两个队列,分别由Downes和Raphaely评分分级为3到6级的插管后喉炎患者,为期两年。我们的人口分为两组:A和B; A和B。两组均接受静脉地塞米松和雾化盐水(B组)和不含(A组)L-肾上腺素。通过Downes和Raphaely的分数评估疗效。与心律失常相比,肾上腺素的不良反应是根据心律不齐的发生,血压升高和平均心律来进行的。结果:A组包括22例患者(平均评分= 4.8), B组19分(平均分= 5.2)。在治疗期间,A组中的3例患者得分为8,并再次插管。在方案的前两个小时内,该组的临床评分也高于B组。这些结果没有统计学意义。没有观察到由于肾上腺素的副作用。两组的胃气参数均足够,但对照组则更好。结论:当雾化的L-肾上腺素与静脉内地塞米松同时使用时,我们没有观察到治疗插管后喉炎的疗效增加。但是,当使用联合疗法时,某些指标确实呈现出有利的趋势,应进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号